Brussels Terror Attacks

I do worry sometimes I really fucking do, you boys, you boys…

Can’t say I’ve seen it working for you too well though. I’ll give you marks for persiistence on that, but none whatever for self-awareness.

1 Like

You haven’t said I’m wrong on this and normally you are anal to the extreme so there we go, have you seen the news and care to pass judgement on that as opposed to me or typo? That is how forums work I’m told, many go missing on here when they get found wanting.

Anal to the extreme? Whatever. You’re free to think what you like. You do strike me as a very sensitive soul though.

I was simply suggesting that the gambit you so deplore (the one that you refer to as the Chewbacca defence, though I’m buggered if I can see why you call it that) is one that you use a great deal of the time yourself. Perhaps it’s wrong of me, but I do find that amusing.

I’m not passing judgement on you, I’m merely passing comment. Where a typo comes into this I haven’t a fucking clue.

You always do, I’m far from senstive and I dont think my attitude writing on the forum displays that nor could it I handle the shit thrown at me if I acutally genuinely were, you are anal merely even to prove a minor point of upmanship, a little grammar nazi if you will albeit a nice one.

You still haven’t disagreed with me which is another classic, go missing on here as the discussion is proved beyond doubt or can’t respond in manner that seems to back up some weak position, you only have to look at the time gaps to see that, similar to chess.

We are all free to think as we like and that is the beauty of it.

Anyway goodnight all.

Do you know why I choose not to engage with you in discussion or debate? It’s because you invariably use what you have recently referred to as the “Chewbacca defence”. Whenever anyone asks you a question or makes a point that you have difficulty answering, you deflect and divert. It’s just what you do, and it’s why fewer and fewer people bother to attempt any debate with you. It’s not because you’re always right and nobody can find any answers to the brilliance of your polemic.

For what it’s worth, i’ve never picked you up on typos, nor have I been a grammar nazi (though it’s kinkd of you to say I’m a nice one). I have said that your posts are frequently unintelligible, and I’ll stand by that comment. Many times I’ve read things you’ve posted several times and still found myself unable to work out just what the fuck you actually mean. It’s not about grammar, or spelling, or typos. It’s about articulating your thoughts in a way that others can understand.

2 Likes

http://thelegalgeeks.com/2013/05/03/a-legal-analysis-of-the-chewbacca-defense/

1 Like

tks b i get it now. I thought i was South Park Expert but i must’ve missed that episode

Some levity.

2 Likes

Mr. Bulsara, I give you the Chewing Tobacco Defence.

This is where I ignore what you’ve written because I’d sooner chew tobacco than try to debate a point to a conclusion with you.

I’m either running scared, or…no let’s just leave it that I’m running scared.

3 Likes

I dont tweet and I came across these by accident, more bile from the odious Ms Hopkins. Given what that twat got pulled up for in Croydon surely some of this is worse?

“Any mosques lit up in the colours of the Belgium flag? No - thought not. Just celebrations in prayer houses country-wide # ReligionOfMurder”

“How about we cut from pics of dead bodies on the Metro - to more boats happily crossing the Med. liberal left - sh*t at joining the dots.”

“Every one of you who said refugees are welcome, if you said ‘let them in.’ You are responsible for Brussels. And you still cant see.”

2 Likes

I think the key word is “twat”. Katie Hopkins is a professional one.

2 Likes

This topic was automatically opened after 4 hours.

This topic is temporarily closed for 4 hours due to a large number of community flags.

This topic was automatically opened after 4 hours.