Probably not a good idea to groom lambs or goats then…
How do we know it was him and he wasn’t patsy? I dont believe it…
For a start, the trial,. Patsies don’t tend to get them.
I have to say I find it amusing that you call JS stuff for posting things on the public record, yet engineer conspiracy theories on behalf on a convicted nonce.
So to escape your conspiracy theories they have to have a trial? This makes them legitimate in the process? What about the Guildford four? They had a trial, if they put up a Mulsim dude in connection with the bombing I won’t be having it Pap, its a stitch up, you have made me so aware, they are everywhere…
I don’t think the justice system is perfect, but it does tend to get the bottom of things as long as it isn’t being interfered with. I am sure we can both agree that it’s more robust than simply being shot by Jack Ruby or (ahem) being dropped into the sea. NI cases are not great examples, btw. Although the Guildford Four were tried by a jury trial in English courts, there were no jury trials in NI.
Besides, Johnson admitted his guilt on a couple of charges.
Baz, you are being a knob.
2 Likes
Originally posted by @CB-Saint
Originally posted by @Barry-Sanchez
So to escape your conspiracy theories they have to have a trial? This makes them legitimate in the process? What about the Guildford four? They had a trial, if they put up a Mulsim dude in connection with the bombing I won’t be having it Pap, its a stitch up, you have made me so aware, they are everywhere…
Baz, you are being a knob.
Yep a trolling knob FFS. 
Being contrary is subjective I see…
More than happy to talk about the Diplock system Pap if you wish.
I dunno, Baz. Upload a documentary with shitloads of eye witness accounts on how Adam Johnson was a patsy, and this particular opinion may be treated with slightly less disdain.
I can’t, similar to others conspiracies, conjecture by wackos on 9/11 etc etc and its all ok as its anti establishment or anti-semitic, the bias on here is amazing.
This topic is temporarily closed for 4 hours due to a large number of community flags.
I have objectively looked at the subjectivity of my previous statement and can only conclude that you are being a knob.
I will add, that for now I limit my assessment to this thread. If you want to have at Pap and JS for terrorist conspiracy theories elsewhere, fill your boots.
2 Likes
Cool no dramas CB.
Originally posted by @Barry-Sanchez
I can’t, similar to others conspiracies, conjecture by wackos on 9/11 etc etc and its all ok as its anti establishment or anti-semitic, the bias on here is amazing.
Jesus fuck, Baz. Where to start?
There is a huge difference between your “Adam Johnson is a patsy” theory and some of the other theories you allude to. I’d also be very interested to see where examples of anti-semitism exist on this site.
But for now, let’s focus on why you aren’t being treated seriously and some of these other examples have slightly more pull. It’s evidence, basically.
Speaking in the abstract, one of the reasons disputes with the official account of any given event exist is evidence which contradicts the official account. Some, including myself, consider the cumulative weight of evidence, meaning that the more things you find that contradict the official account, especially when it comes from credible sources, the less likely you are to believe it.
So on that basis, what evidence do you offer for Adam Johnson being framed up? Conspiracy types at least offer a YouTube.
Assuming a scenario where you have no competing evidence, you’re in a tough spot. At best, you’re on tilt, trolling because of your bruising defeats earlier in the day. At worst, you’re a nonce apologist*.
* (I know, it’s disgusting when people throw terms like that around)
Pap and JS may well be total odd balls when it comes to conspiracy theories but FFS, on this thread? Really? Get a fucking grip.
2 Likes
Well, this case has been needlessly dragged out for ages (by Johnson’s own arrogance and selfishness) and I’d like to say “thank god it’s finally over” and the girl and her family can find some closure – but no. The cunt is “appealing”. 
The ‘so-called’ six year sentence, on the face of it sounds like a good result. He got what he deserved.
But (and there’s so often one of those) – the reality is, he’ll likely serve half of that time inside, the rest on licence / parole. If he keeps his head down, he could even get out in a couple of years for “good behaviour”. I.e. there weren’t any just turned fifteen year old girls to groom and fuck in prison. (Or any animals).
I’d also like to think that he’ll have a very hard time of it inside. “Nonses” aren’t usually made to feel particularly welcome behind bars. But then, I have a horrible feeling that he’ll be well protected. With his status and vast wealth, I suspect he’ll be able to make some early deals some of the main players wherever he ends up, who’ll look after him and make sure he gets by relatively unscathed, for a high enough price. 
I’d love to be wrong, and he ends up doing a long stretch, involving a substantial amount of picking up soap in the showers and lots of “mummies and daddies” games to keep him occupied, involving plenty of sucking on “mummy’s cock”.
But I just don’t have much faith that he is really going to end up on the receiving end of the full justice he and the girl both deserve.
“Nonce” is a prison specific acronym, JS.
Not on normal communal exercise.
That’s why it’s technically accurate to say there are no establishment nonces. They never get to prison.
1 Like
Jesus wept, Baz. Been a hard week for you, hasn’t it.
Just learn when to shut up mate.
2 Likes
I think we should discuss this theory privately Bazza. Would you like to meet up in my Range Rover behind the shops?