Tebbit test on full view

Maybe you’re asking the wrong questions, I am sure you’re ok in real life so why not?

Dunno bout Marry, but there’s been a lot in the news, even in ur Northern Towns, about Muslim lads integrating with the local white girls srs. Maybe you missed it.

I am not too sure that was legal or consensual.

Barry rants about Muslims, which is basically what this is, just for a change. You’re really quite tedious, Baz.

Originally posted by @Fatso

Barry rants about Muslims, which is basically what this is, just for a change. You’re result quite tedious, Baz.

No ita not but I’m not wrong so there we go, you deny it or even worse ignore, fair play chubby punter fair play.

I know baz, you just say as you see. Except what you see always seemto see is anti Muslim. I reckon you could turn any thread into an anti Muslim direction.

You stlll don’t deny it, Bazza in the 3rd person has made and backed up his points he can’t go on anymore, you could turn any thread into one about food though.

Originally posted by @Barry-Sanchez

You stlll don’t deny it, Bazza in the 3rd person has made and backed up his points he can’t go on anymore

Thank fuck for that.

1 Like

Well then, how about this Gary Younge article from 2011. I’d say he has it pretty much spot on.

1 Like

The French have staked their founding revolutionary creed against the notion of multiculturalism. They are losing. Like it or not – and the state doesn’t – it’s a multicultural country.

This bit is bollocks I’ll think you’ll agree.

He also writes of Bavarians on Germany and do they have a desire to go seperate, I could go on about the Basque’s wanting away or the Catalunians.

This was also before Rotherham, Oxford etc etc, I’d also love to see statistics backing the claims of Hindu’s, Sikh’s and Muslims marrying at the same rate outside their own groups as whites.

I would not agree, no. And what point were you trying to make by giving more examples of something that Younge had already cited? Very odd.

And can you conjure statistics to back your contrary claim?

Whatever, as is your wont you’ve done nothing to refute the points made in that article, merely sidetracked.

Inter-ethnic marriages form a very small proportion of all marriages in England and Wales as a whole - 2 per cent. There were 10.3 million married couples in England and Wales on census day in 2001. The vast majority of these marriages, 98 per cent, were between people from the same ethnic background, where ethnic background is defined as White, Mixed, Asian, Black, Chinese, or Other ethnic group. Two per cent of marriages were between people from different ethnic backgrounds (219,000). Of these inter-ethnic marriages, most (198,000) included a White person. In the remaining 21,000 inter-ethnic marriages both partners were from different minority ethnic backgrounds. The most common inter-ethnic marriages were between White and Mixed race people, 26 per cent of all inter-ethnic marriages. Marriages between a White person and someone who described their ethnic group as ‘Other’ were the next most common (15 per cent), followed by White and Black Caribbean marriages (12 per cent), and White and Indian marriages (11 per cent). People from the Mixed ethnic group were the most likely to be married to someone outside their ethnic group (78 per cent). The Mixed ethnic group is relatively small and there are limited opportunities to marry someone from the same ethnic group. However, mixed race people are often married to someone from a related ethnic group. For example, among men who described their own ethnic group as ‘Mixed - White and Black Caribbean’, 76 per cent were married to White women, 8 per cent to Black Caribbean women and 11 per cent to ‘Mixed – White and Black Caribbean’ women. Among people who described their ethnic group as ‘Other’, 56 per cent of women and 34 per cent of men had married outside their ethnic group and most had married a White person. This Other group includes people from the Philippine Islands, Malaysia, Japan, Vietnam and various middle-eastern countries. People who described their ethnic group as ‘Other Black’, largely young Black people born in Britain, were the next most likely to be married to someone outside their ethnic group, followed by Black Caribbean people. Almost five in ten Other Black men (48 per cent) and three in ten Black Caribbean men (29 per cent) were married to women outside the Black ethnic group, in most cases White women. People from South Asian backgrounds were the least likely of the minority ethnic groups to be married to someone from a different ethnic group. Only 6 per cent of Indians, 4 per cent of Pakistanis, and 3 per cent of Bangladeshis had married someone outside the Asian group. As well as cultural and racial differences, people from South Asian backgrounds generally have different religions to people from other ethnic groups which may explain their relatively low inter-marriage rate. People who described their ethnicity as ‘Other Asian’ were more likely to have married a non-Asian person (18 per cent). Although most inter-ethnic marriages include a White person, White people are the least likely to be married to someone outside their ethnic group – only 1 per cent of White men or women had done so. White people form the majority population in England and Wales (91 per cent) and consequently there are limited opportunities to marry people from a minority ethnic group. This is particularly true for people living outside London, where the minority ethnic population is often very small. Patterns of inter-ethnic marriage were similar for men and women. Exceptions were that Black women were less likely than Black men to have married outside their ethnic group, and Chinese women were more likely than Chinese men to have done so

Thats from national stasitics of ethnicity and indentity.

What extolling the virtues of multiculturalism by devolution in to smaller more distinct group? I take it you voted out then?

Try as I might, I can’t make out what the hell you’re talking about here, or what it is you’re trying to say.

2 Likes

Multiculturalism doesn’t work, so that leaves monoculturalism or possibly non-culturalism? How to go about achieving mono culturalism?

What geographical boundaries should each culture adhere to?

How should the ruling culture in any given area be defined and transgressions against it eliminated?

I think we can leave the non-culturalism on the back burner for the Friday nighters on the piss, but we need to sort out all the wrong cultures.

You haven’t replied to my post that you asked for, no need no need.

You’re saying that Spain for instance is multicultural but you don’t mention the separation agenda within, how is splitting up something making it more multicultural?

You haven’t replied to my post that you asked for, no need no need.

You’re saying that Spain for instance is multicultural but you don’t mention the separation agenda within, how is splitting up something making it more multicultural?

I’m going with what the experts say I’m afraid, as proficient as the punters are on here I’ll have to go for experts, cheers.