Social Integration is not happening

Originally posted by @Chertsey-Saint

Originally posted by @pap

Originally posted by @Chertsey-Saint

Originally posted by @pap

Originally posted by @Chertsey-Saint

Originally posted by @Barry-Sanchez

No I didn’t read it again, I said near 100% and it was an expression of statement than fact, many aren’t brought up British in the true value of all are equal, if they did then there wouldn’t be continued sexism, Cherts you advocate sexism I don’t.

Near 100%, like the 95% threshold I gave you Bazza.

And I quote:

No where near quick enough, here in the North we have schools that are near 100% foriegn born…you think I am exaggerating to make a point, I can assure you I am not

Why are you lying again Barry? I tell you what, how about you go away and think of some more lies to dig yourself out of another hole…what a joke, can’t even defend what he wrote earlier in the same day.

Advocate sexism, nice one Baz. At least I don’t touch children for pleasure like you, you fucking nonce.

What the actual fuck Cherts?

Come on Pap, he lies about me, I lie about him. It’s all fair game I thought?

He’d never sink to those depths. You have.

Nah, he’s only called people rape apologists.

So you’re a hypocrite as well as a cunt?

I am not making it up when I think you’re a cunt.

1 Like

No Cherts you’re a cunt, what you said isn’t trolling or if thats your form of it then its poor, I think its your temper and you weren’t aware of the reaction you’d get, I can assure you if you said to face to face you wouldn’t be reading this now, you’d be bounced up the fucking street, and most men would say the same, what you said then said an awful lot about you and you are a cunt.

Cherts you’re a cunt fullstop, thats not trolling, thats being a cunt for an obvious reaction, Cherts I can assure you again if I see you I will call you a cunt to your face for the “troll” and I can assure you again you wont do anything but melt.

why don’t you just ignore each other? Or fuck off?

9 Likes

I agree but the cunt follows me everywhere.

This is probably why SWF has swear filters.

Look at the fucking pair of you. In my estimation, Cherts is more out of order, but the fact is, you’re both out of order. Is this Sotonians, is it?

Is this our exemplary content?

Is it fuck, but it’s becoming that way. Sort it out, or the Sin Bin category and Twat poster category becomes a reality this fucking week. You won’t appear on the main page. You can fling as much shit as you want at each other, and people can see it if they so elect.

You’ll never fucking be on Latest Discussions, because this is no discussion. It’s a flame war that has gone on, spread to multiple threads. I’m sick of it.

You’ll get your freedom of speech, but will anyone bother to read once you can’t infest the main page with it?

are you pissed? You’re acting like a real arsehole.

I’m off to bed. Goodnight.

1 Like

Wonderful to see everyone getting right into the Christmas spirit!

Made my evening.

Top work, Chaps.

1 Like

:lou_facepalm_2:

3 Likes

Originally posted by @Chertsey-Saint

If you don’t know how to do an ignore function then that’s fine Pap, I’ll have to deal with it. Perhaps you could ask Steve Grant, as he obviously knows how to do it.

Nah, he chooses to. Not a question of knowhow.

However, as long as he keeps appearing on my feed I will continue.

I’d like to know where. You’re on guest status until at least 7pm this evening.

You were the one that said he’s a troll, and he trolls about the whole racism/xenophobia thing. Problem is, I don’t like people thinking those subjects are funny, because they’re not, and I’m surprised you think that it is a good look for your site that it looks like a site that thinks those subjects are funny.

The nadir of this site was reached last night. Hypo almost went as far once, but immediately deleted his post. You’ve decided that you’re going to double down.

You’re not a good look for this site right now. You can post when there’s someone to look after you. See you after seven tonight, yeah?

Don’t try to take the moral highground, I genuinely believe you"re appearing to defend a culture that is sexist, are you defending a culture that is sexist? I believe the Muslim culture to be sexist from my western point of view ie men’s only places etc and you come out with that?

You then say it’s not the culture it’s the person, what sort of person calls someone a paedophile to troll or prove a point in a debate? I’ll say it again I don’t believe it was a ‘troll’ retort but upping stakes in anger.

Trying to take the moral highground on that will fuck your dossier you spiteful little cunt.

Originally posted by @Barry-Sanchez

Don’t try to take the moral highground, I genuinely believe you"re appearing to defend a culture that is sexist, are you defending a culture that is sexist? I believe the Muslim culture to be sexist from my western point of view ie men’s only places etc and you come out with that?

You then say it’s not the culture it’s the person, what sort of person calls someone a paedophile to troll or prove a point in a debate? I’ll say it again I don’t believe it was a ‘troll’ retort but upping stakes in anger.

Trying to take the moral highground on that will fuck it your dossier you spiteful little cunt.

Barry; turn it in or you’re on a break too.

3 Likes

Not a problem, and I apologise to all for that, it does you no favours nor anyone reading it, without him here I won’t respond as he can’t defend himself, so yes I am sorry not to him I’ll add not at all but to people who read this.

what a bunch of fannies

1 Like

I have Reviewed all the Evidence, and it’s a borderline case imo. I don’t think we can be suspending bros for namecalling, because namecalling is the grand tradition upon which this forum was founded. I call you stuff, you call me stuff back. It’s the circle of life. At first I thought it was just a case of Sarb bringing a paedophile to a sex fight, and I was a bit sympathy, there’s a few bros on here I have suspicions about myself, but it weren’t purely a case of calling Barry a paedophile. If I’m reading things right, and it’s tough because some of the evidence seems to have been doctored, he went as far as describing B fiddling with children, which brought up an unwanted mental image in my Face, and I wasn’t so keen on That.

When you add to the fact that Sarb is openly Tory, and owns a second home which he rents out at market rates, I think I will have to reluctantly let this stand, and won’t be approaching the bench at this point. I look forward to reading the case for defence later tho, I suspect he feels it deeply yo!

Edit: A Good Read all round tho. Well done Everyone!

1 Like

Originally posted by @CB-Saint

what a bunch of fannies

Why don’t we have a popcorn eating emoticon?

Seriously though, that was fucking weird guys, have a word with yourselves.

1 Like

Here’s the deal. You twats stop needing moderation and I’ll stop writing long and boring posts about it. Deal?

I’ve just read this thread from the beginning to ensure that I have all the background - and they say modding on sotonians.com has no perks!

Shirty has been moved to guest status to give him a bit of time to reflect on some of the content posted last night.

I’ve not had a chance to chat my response to this through with pap, but here are my thoughts. Where I appear to be speaking for pap, you should assume that I am not speaking for pap.

Firstly, sotonians.com advocates free speech and this thread has a right to exist.

It was created, ostensibly, to debate a current news story. If it were not created or not allowed to be created, there would be a problem.

That it exists is not a problem, in, and of itself.

Barry is making nuanced points in this thread that have a right to be heard and debated. It can be seen that on a number of occasions, he tries to steer the thread away from ethnicity and religion to instead debate culture. Others are bringing baggage to the thread and making assumptions about Barry’s motivation. Perhaps they are right about his motivation. Perhaps they are not. I do not know. But there is no content in this thread that I can see that warrants the extreme reaction that Barry has received.

These are my views formed through my eyes with all the baggage I have to help me form those views. I may be wrong.

Several people have debated with Barry during the two weeks the thread has been running. They eventually stopped debating - presumably feeling they had made their point, won the argument, lost the argument or were wasting their time.

On reflection, this seems like a sound approach to me.

There is nothing that Barry has posted in this thread that makes me concerned that our defence of freedom of speech is ignoring sotonians.com’s responsibilities to protect the rights of others.

Therefore, if we are to defend freedom of speech, we have to defend Barry’s right to create threads like this and contribute similar content in other threads.

This is an absolute consequence of one of the central tenets of sotonians.com.

So, what to do about content that you don’t want to see on sotonians.com?

  1. If content here incites racial hatred or any other hate crime against a societal group, downvote it and report it immediately to pap or me via private message.

  2. If content here is not the sort of thing you, personally, want to see on sotonians.com, downvote it. This helps pap and myself moderate behind the scenes.

  3. Debate with the individual(s) involved and try to change the world by clearly communicating your views. If this starts to get too much for you, see 4) or 5) below.

  4. Ignore it and read / write something else.

  5. Fuck off. I really hope this is an absolute last resort.

Trolling on this thread and elsewhere on the site

pap previously made the point that having met Barry, much of what he writes is designed to provoke a reaction. Many on here, apparently Chertsey included, took that to mean that Barry believes little of what he writes and that he is solely trolling. I’m not sure that was what pap meant and I personally don’t believe that of Barry.

In any case, _ assuming _ that a poster spends most of his days trolling, the one way to ensure that poster _ wins _ the debate you are engaged in, is to resort to trolling yourself or to drop the p-bomb as we saw last night.

Certainly, pointing out that you believe you have proof that someone is trolling you is no excuse for trolling them back. Afterall, Bletch’s 45th law of forum diplomacy states that If you are certain that you are being trolled and you react, then you, my friend, are a dick.

Trolling is not absolute, it is a sliding scale. At one end of that scale, you can see trolling as simply being a poster’s schtick or how they engage in banter. At the other end of the scale, usually, when trolls band together, it becomes debilitating and kills forums.

I believe that we have a small number of posters for whom trolling has become their schtick. I’m personally comfortable with that at the moment*, but, obviously, we’ll be driven by the community and its reaction to it.

Debate or fuck off.

#DoFo

*I’m not comfortable** with the trolling I face from those who think it is funny to point out how easily I get drunk whenever I mention alcohol.

**Bletch is comfortable with this and was attempting to show how one man’s trolling is another man’s banter.

8 Likes