Maybe, if you’d spelt it correctly.
It might just be me, but I have an inkling that Swdp just might be a bit of a knob.
k-nob?
I don’t want to believe that! I think we can help him find salvation!
#prayforstickywhitedovepiss
that just sounds perverted
2 Likes
Hi Coxford Lou,
Genuinely, where have I taken the piss out of any minority groups?
SWDP xxxx
Hi CB Saint,
What gives you that impression? conscious consideration or unthinking pack instinct coupled with void imagination?
Hi SWDP,
Thanks for replying!
Well, I guess posting photos of transgender women on a football website, could be seen as taking the piss. I mean, I’ve don’t really get the sense from the text you write along side the pictures, that you’re highlighting the bravery or challenges these women suffer.
On the other hand, if you’re genuinely posting the photos for your own sexual gratification, then we all know where I stand on that - I would rather you didn’t. There are porn websites for that sort of thing that you can enjoy in private.
If you’re posting the pictures just to try and embarrass blokes on here who might assume they’re not transgender women, then I still think that’s taking the piss.
If it’s neither of these answers, then I’m not sure what’s left? Perhaps you could enlighten me?
Lots of love,
Lou.
3 Likes
Your ‘conscious consideration’ of the transgender issue appears to be posting pictures of porn stars with balls and tits that you would happily fuck. Right on man.
1 Like
Ok I was gonna post a bit more on this earlier, when SWDP and Pap were going backwards and forwards with their posts, but then I decided to leave it. But as this is escalating again, here’s my tuppence!
I can see where both Pap and SWDP are coming from on this. Pap referred earlier in this thread to me backing SWDP, likewise SWDP has complimented the stuff I’ve said on this thread. I don’t really want to be seen as backing anyone, but more what seems right or wrong to me, but in the context of what this forum is supposed to represent and considering the reasons it was started up, personally I disagree with some of the stuff that’s been implied on here, it’s exactly the sort of thing I though we were trying to move away from?
Ultimately I don’t know who SWDP is or what his intentions are and actually I totally get why several of you are thinking SWDP is on the wind up. I don’t even disagree with this to an extent, he’s come in with a new user name that none of us know from a previous life and he’s said some things that can (and have) been ‘interpreted’ (and there’s the key word, interpreted) as being a bit controversial and/or negative on several occasions already.
But to me, it seems like Pap started having a go at him about stuff that, had it been said/done by other users on here, nothing would have been said… am I wrong on this? That’s Paps prerogative, it’s his forum. I’m not saying suspicions about SWDP are wrong or unfounded, but the evidence is very much open to interpretation, still at least opinions are being expressed on here in a more transparent way, so fair play to Pap for being so honest and upfront about it.
In his explanation earlier Sticky has referred to a few things, maybe Tokyo can confirm the point about the stalking, as I also ‘interpreted’ that the same way as you Pap, it ‘sounded’ like SWDP was stalking Tokyo, but what if we did make an incorrect assumption? Maybe SWDP and Tokyo have been chatting, maybe it was Turkish that he was referring too?
The bit Sticky has put about the t-girls thread is correct, I did mention in the Mario Suarez thread about it sounding like it could have its own thread. I’ll be honest, I had no idea it was a term used for transgenders, I genuinely thought about tea-girls when I said that!!! We’re so used to nuns in threads, I though tea girls would have been something to fill another thread.
With regards to if these sort of pictures should be on here or not, it’s no different then stuff from the Muppet Show area of SaintWeb, isn’t that what the Monkey Tennis part of this forum is for?
Based on comments Pap has made, this thread has now just evolved into several people v’s SWDP going backwards and forwards, people are suspicious of him (and more recently being insulting) and he’s either one of two things:
Either he’s taking great pleasure from how people have reacted and he’ll continue to take the piss and keep on pushing things further and further(until he gets banned and people can say “I told you so”
Or, he’s maybe a bit hacked off people are now being so off with him when he’s not done anything different than many others on here would get away with. Maybe if this is the case, following feedback he’ll think a bit more about what he’s saying in threads and build himself more of a solid reputation going forwards? Fingers crossed.
But with the greatest of respect to Pap, in my view, it’s his comments that have escalated things on this thread.
Either way, maybe it would be better to lock this thread now and we’ll watch this space with regards to how Sticky acts? But regardless of what may have happened had the thread run its natural original course, it’s certainly been pushed in a very different direction now.
1 Like
I’m not really a follow the herd kinda guy, but as it was just an inkling, let’s put it down to instinct / gut feel / call it what you will.
HTH
Hi Lou,
Technically based on the name this isn’t a football website it’s a Southampton website from which i guess you could maybe extrapolate that it’s a website about society.
If I was posting images for sexual satisfaction, I am obviously very bad at working search engines.
I’ve already mentioned that not a great deal of thought has gone into conceiving the thread, but frankly this is a message board and not a peer reviewed journal and i could give you numerous other examples where people haven’t put a great deal of effort into conceiving the idea of a thread and haven’t been bullied into defending.
Having said that I maintain that ive not really posted anything offensive and that the thread has basically been soured by Pap’s slightly strange and paranoid intervention. Further there have been contributions here from others, notably recent posts by goatboy which have displayed far less sensitivity to issues than i have. I agree that i’ve not highlighted the womens challenges but thats not to say i wouldn’t welcome that discussion.
I seem to remember bletch himself using the transgender stick to jovially beat you with when you first started interacting with the forum and noone complained about that. There is definitely some hypocricy here.
Xxxx
Hey Spudders,
I think Papster was quite rightly reacting to the subtext of SWDP’s posting. And I really really like the fact he did that. Because, let’s fact it, transgender women are a pretty easy target for a cheap joke. But this forum is bigger than that.
Oh, and I don’t think this place is anything like TMS. Way more respect here.
Originally posted by @StickyWhiteDovePiss
Hi Lou,
Technically based on the name this isn’t a football website it’s a Southampton website from which i guess you could maybe extrapolate that it’s a website about society.
If I was posting images for sexual satisfaction, I am obviously very bad at working search engines.
I’ve already mentioned that not a great deal of thought has gone into conceiving the thread, but frankly this is a message board and not a peer reviewed journal and i could give you numerous other examples where people haven’t put a great deal of effort into conceiving the idea of a thread and haven’t been bullied into defending.
Having said that I maintain that ive not really posted anything offensive and that the thread has basically been soured by Pap’s slightly strange and paranoid intervention. Further there have been contributions here from others, notably recent posts by goatboy which have displayed far less sensitivity to issues than i have. I agree that i’ve not highlighted the womens challenges but thats not to say i wouldn’t welcome that discussion.
I seem to remember bletch himself using the transgender stick to jovially beat you with when you first started interacting with the forum and noone complained about that. There is definitely some hypocricy here.
Xxxx
Hey SWDP,
I’m pleased you’ve hung around on this 
Maybe we just don’t know you well enough to really understand your sense of humour and whether lighthearted or not. I’ll give you benefit of the doubt.
On a surface level, you can find hypocrisies everywhere. I’ve probably completely confused Ohio by merrily talking about boobs one minute, while complaining about him bleating on about boobs the next. But there is a difference.
All I can say is this place isn’t like TMS. And what is or isn’t OK on here, we’re figuring out as we go along. People power!
x
1 Like
I didn’t say this place was like the muppet show Lou, I said that the Monkey Tennis section of this place was like the Muppet show, it’s just one part of this forum and I was obviously referring to the type of content being posted and where it should be placed.
I totally agree that this place is as a whole generally more respectful, I much prefer it here than any other Saints forum. But the two points I was trying to make are that:
-
by trying to call out SWDP some people seem to have reverted to similar characteristics to those they’re accusing him of! Just because SWDP is ‘allegedly’ being disrespectful, is that any reason to be like that towards him?
-
other people on here are getting away with equally risky comments/pictures, but aren’t being called out on it because they are known, is that right and fair?
1 Like
SWDP, you dtarted this thread by posting pictures of transexual pornstars.
Then you posted this to pap: “Why aren’t you interested in a tgirl thread Pap? With Tgirls there is something for everyone. Are you not a red blooded male?”
Now it’s me that’s being disrespectful for putting into plain English exactly what you are alluding to, ie. that you want to discuss whether or not anyone else finds transexuals sexually exciting.
Stop being a fucking bellend.
Hi Goatboy,
I can see that the post you highlighted could be construed as being somewhat disrespectful towards Pap in that he might argue he is being accused of something he doesn’t feel is true. I’m not really convinced it is disrespectful towards the subject of this thread. In context i also objected to the accusations pap had made against me and still continues to make.
You’re not really adding anything to this but cheap putdowns and obscenity
And you are adding what exactly? Is this just a thread to post pictures of pornstars in underwear? To let everyone know that you are so broadminded that you masturbate over transexuals? Or do you genuinely wish to discuss the issues of the LGBT community? If the latter then I apologise for suggesting that you are a trolling fuckwit and suggest that this is moved to the serious discussion forum.
As you can see from my first few posts on the thread, I am not rreally interested in trading snaps of transexuals in underwear. If this is what you are after then I suspect you should be looking on more specialist forums.
1 Like
Hi Goatboy,
Who knows what this thread might have become and as i have now stated numerous times, the original intent was not really clear, even to me.
The thread has gone sour to mind now. A testament to poor paranoia driven moderation and the negative aspects of people’s pack mentality. Moving it to serious discussion is pointless. Let it die.