Bairstow, Morgan and Stokes going in quick succession killed that, sadly. We were just building up momentum as well. Nicely set up for the decider on Saturday.
Which is just what the Asian bookies ordered
āā
Fuck me Phil, and I thought I was a cynic! Youāre probably right though.
Looking back on it, a bad umpiring mistake could have made the difference. In the Indian innings a wide was given for a ball that clearly came off the leg, and the extra ball went for four.
I know thatās only 5 and they won by 8, but the last three balls would have been a different prospect if weād needed four from them instead of 9.
And I could add a ball outside leg stump in Englandās innings not given as wide. Thatās unusual, although to be fair it was close to the stumps: but theyāre still usually given.
But the Indians also had a wicket given that shouldnāt have been allegedly.
You mean the catch on the boundary? Very inconclusive.
Hmm, turn over to the 5th ODI and India are 88-0 from 8.2 overs
Rohit Sharma 59 from 31
Hmm.
Maybe movie time
Thank fuck for that Stokes get Rohit to play on to his stumps
94-1
Sharma 64 from 34
Yes, I just did the same. Oh dear. And Stokes just bowls Sharma with a leg cutter. Desperately needed wicket that.
Apart from the new boy in smashes 2 sixes from his first 3 balls
110-1 after 10 overs.
This could be a monster total
Hmm
YouTube
Michael Kiwanuka or however it is spelt
This is brutal battingā¦
What a catch by Chris Jordan, you have got to see it to believe itā¦
Running the boundary catches the ball one handed, realises heās going to go out of bounds so lobs the ball gently to Royā¦
Nasser Hussain āChris Jordan you are an absolute freakā
143-2, the dangerous Yadav gone, caught Roy!!!
I missed a soft catch didnt I
yeah, it went straight to Roy, he didnāt have to moveā¦
Kholi 51 up from 37 balls
170-2 from 16
224-2 this is going to be some run chase on a āgood surfaceā
Roy has his stumps rearranged second ball, England 0-1.